The Elder Law Firm of Marshall & Associates
Contact Us Meet Our Staff Articles Of Interest Long Term Care Planning Estate Planning Our Newsletters


Search PAElderLaw.com
 

 

News & Events

 

Donna & Ralph:  The Effects of Act 42 on Low-Income Pennsylvania Seniors 

The following illustration is intended to provide a window into what will really happen to families currently relying on Medicaid funded home waiver services as a result of Sections 441.7 and 441.8 of Act 42.  These sections of Act 42 have nothing to do with transfers of assets.  They affect only low-income seniors like Ralph whose situation is set forth below.  The change in the home Waiver rules (Section 441.8) has no effect on higher income individuals since seniors with incomes above 300 % of SSI ($1737 a month this year) are too wealthy to qualify for Medicaid-funded home waiver services.


Donna's Care-giving Crisis

Ralph is 65 and although he is alert and oriented, he suffers from a degenerative brain disease that interferes with his walking and speech. He has started falling, and his care is becoming more difficult.  He could stay at this level of care for a significant amount of time.

Ralph's wife Donna, age 56, is a waitress. When Ralph was discharged from the hospital, Donna left her job at a restaurant to care for her husband.  She wants to keep Ralph at home for as long as possible.  I married him "in sickness and in health, for better or worse" she says.  The couple is childless and has no other family supports. 

After Ralph was discharged from the hospital, Donna soon reached the breaking point. Caring for him was a 24 hour/seven day a week job, involving immense physical and emotional stress.  She could not safely leave Ralph alone.  In desperation, Donna called an elder law attorney to see if she could get some help. 

The elder law attorney did a home visit and found that Ralph had a monthly income of $867 from Social Security and $106 from a pension.  Since leaving her employment, Donna has no income.  The couple also has some investment income that varies from month to month.

They own their home which is worth about $80,000. They have investments of $40,000 in joint names and some money Donna recently inherited from her mother's estate ($30,000).  This adds up to $70,000 in available resources.  The couple is very concerned about Donna's long-term financial security.

The lawyer recommended that Donna call her local office of aging to ask about having Ralph apply for the PDA 60+waiver program.  This is a Medicaid-funded program that can provide home care services for seniors who are clinically eligible for nursing home care.  It can allow seniors like Ralph to remain in their homes rather than being placed in a nursing facility.

The aging office sent a care manager out to assess the situation and develop a care plan for Ralph. Acting on the advice of the lawyer and the care manager, Ralph and Donna transferred ownership of their investments to Donna's sole name.  This allowed Ralph to qualify financially for waiver services. Now Donna is getting the help she needs to keep Ralph at home.  The aging office is providing an average of 3 hours a day in various forms of Medicaid Waiver funded home care assistance to the couple.  Donna is especially grateful for the help with bathing Ralph, which was a real big problem for her.  Ralph is a big man, and Donna is quite petite.  The Waiver-funded help also allows Donna to go shopping and get some respite from the constant drain of care-giving.  Although she is still "on duty" 21 hours a day, at least she now has some "down time."  She joined a care-giver support group.

The Effect of Act 42 on Donna and Ralph

Unfortunately, under Act 42, Ralph will no longer be able to qualify for the Medicaid funded Waiver program. He will be thrown off the program in a few months, as soon as the Department of Public Welfare gets around to re-assessing the couple's financial situation.

Under Section 441.8 of the new law, the savings held in Donna's name will be treated as available to pay for Ralph's care.  Donna will be allowed to retain only $35,000 of the couple's $70,000 as her spousal protected share and Ralph will be able to retain $8,000.  But the couple will still have $27,000 too much to qualify for the Waiver program under the new Act 42 rules.  Ralph will be thrown off the Waiver program and the four hours of daily assistance will cease.    

When Donna gets this news, she will no doubt call her lawyer in a panic.  The lawyer can outline her choices under Act 42:

Choice 1.   Place Ralph in a nursing home and go back to work.  This will probably be the best choice for Donna's long-term financial (and probably physical and mental) well-being.  Donna and Ralph will still have to spend down $27,000 but Donna will be able to keep all of her earnings from work. The nursing home staff will relieve Donna of her care-giving burdens and she will be able to get back to a relatively normal life.  (Note that this option will cost the state more each month than it would have cost had Ralph remained at home under Waiver.  Waiver cost less than nursing home care because Waiver services simply supplement the services being provided by family care-givers like Donna.)  

Choice 2.   Apply for home care services under the totally state-funded "Options" program.  There is usually a cap on the cost of services the state will provide under Options, and Ralph needs more assistance than could be provided within that cap.  But, the local office of aging can choose to waive the cap in certain cases.  If the cap is ignored, Donna and Ralph may be able to get the same level of services that they were getting under the Medicaid funded Waiver program.  (Note that this option will cost the state a lot more each month than it would have cost to have kept Ralph at home on the mostly federally funded Waiver program)

Choice 3. Stay home and continue to care for Ralph, but without any assistance or respite.  Or private pay for help with Ralph's care until the $27,000 has been used up. This will negatively affect Donna's long-term financial security and effectively punish her to choosing to provide care for her husband at home.

Choice 4. Seek to retain Ralph's Waiver eligibility by filing an appeal under Section 441.7 of Act 42. Because she is a low-income spouse, the appeal, if successful, may allow Donna to purchase an annuity rather than having to spend the $27,000 on Ralph's care. Unfortunately, to pursue this appeal, Donna and Ralph will have to run a gauntlet of obstacles.  Under Act 42, they will have to do all of the following:

A. Fill out a resource assessment form.  

B.  Provide the County Assistance Office (CAO) with documentation of their gross monthly incomes.

C.   Calculate the interest income generated by Donna's protected share.

D.  Project the amount of Ralph's income that Donna would receive in the future in the event that Ralph predeceases Donna. This means Donna and Ralph will have to contact Social Security and Ralph's pension plan and ask them to calculate this information and provide verification of it. (Whether they can actually obtain this kind of verification, and how long that will take, is open to question). They must provide the verification to the CAO before they can pursue the appeal.

E. Wait for notification from the CAO as to whether Donna can keep any additional savings.

F.  If the CAO says Donna can keep all or any part of the excess $27,000, Donna must then  contact at least 3 insurance companies and get quotes on immediate annuities that meet all the following special requirements:

(1) The annuity must generate income for as long as Donna will live with a guaranteed period that is equal to Donna's actuarial life expectancy.  (This type of annuity is generally referred to as a "Lifetime Guaranteed Period Annuity"). At age 56, Donna's actuarial life-expectancy is approximately 26 years.  An immediate annuity with a purchase price of $27,000 and the provisions required by Department of Public Welfare (DPW) will probably generate about $130-$140 a month for Donna.

(2) The annuity must pay out principal and interest in equal monthly payments;

(3) DPW must be named as the designated beneficiary of the annuity upon the death of Donna;

(4) DPW must receive the remaining annuity payments if Donna dies before the expiration of the guaranteed payment period of the annuity; and       

(5) DPW can receive a lump sum payment from the annuity if Ralph predeceases Donna. 

G.  Donna must provide the CAO with the three annuity quotes. The CAO will select the cheapest annuity quoted in its calculations and advise the couple of this decision.

H. The CAO will prepare a Stipulated Agreement to be signed by all parties that specifies how much of the $27,000 Donna will be able to retain.

I.  After the Stipulated Agreement is reviewed and signed, the CAO will forward it to the Bureau of Hearings and Appeals.

J.  Upon receipt of an Order from the Bureau of Hearings and Appeals, the CAO will notify Donna and Ralph that they must actually purchase the annuity and provide a copy of the annuity to the CAO.

K. Upon receipt of the annuity document from the couple, the CAO will review the annuity to ensure that it meets the DPW requirements and, if it qualifies, forward a copy of the annuity to the Third Party Liability (TPL) Unit in Harrisburg. 

L. Ralph will not be eligible for waiver services until after all of the above is accomplished. The CAO will then authorize Medicaid/LTC benefits effective the date set forth in the Stipulated Agreement.  

Donna and Ralph are fortunate.  Donna is relatively young and in good general health.  She may actually be able to eventually find her path through this regulatory maze.  Most community spouses are much older.  They will be unlikely to be able to obtain the full financial protections allowed by law. 

-Return to News & Events Page-

© 2000-2005  Marshall & Associates   www.paelderlaw.com