|
Governor's
Bud
get
Emphasizes Home Care; DPW "Income First" Proposal Likely to Expire
Written By:
Attorney
Jeffrey A. Marshall
, CELA*
Governor
Rendell has released his Administration's budget for 2004-2005.
The
budget anticipates a substantial increase in the provision of long term
care services in the home and a corresponding decrease in the number of
institutionalized recipients of long term care.
The budget recommends a significant expansion in home and community
based care as an alternative to nursing home care.
As a result, the number of people who are clinically eligible for
nursing home care but who will instead be provided with in-home services
by the Pennsylvania Department of Aging is expected to increase to 27,380
next year (from 23,035 this year). The
cost of this expansion in home care largely will be funded from Tobacco
Settlement funds.
For
those of us who have been concerned with the Department of Public
Welfare's (DPW's) proposal to put new limits on the financial
resources that can be retained by low income community spouses, the budget
contains good news. The
budget recommendation is that no Medical Assistance eligibility reductions
occur during the upcoming year. As a result, it now seems unlikely that
the Medical Assistance eligibility changes that were first proposed by DPW
in October 2002 will be implemented.
Here
is the reasoning behind our speculation that the proposed Medical
Assistance eligibility changes will be allowed to expire.
DPW
is required by statute to submit its final regulations within two years of
their initial proposal. For the "income first" regulations, the end of
this two year period will occur during the Governor's upcoming budget
year. If finalized, the
proposed regulations would make it more difficult for married individuals
to qualify for Medical Assistance for nursing home care. This would
constitute an eligibility reduction, in violation of the Governor's
budget. Since the final
regulations would be contrary to the Governor's stated intentions and
since DPW works under the Governor, we think it is unlikely that the
regulations would be filed.
Thus,
it appears likely that the regulations will not be acted upon during the
upcoming year. And, if DPW
does not submit its final regulations within this upcoming year, the
regulations will be deemed legally withdrawn.
Pennsylvania's
retention of the more protective "resource first" method of qualifying
married couples for Medical Assistance represents a significant victory
for elder law attorneys and other advocates for seniors who opposed the
rule change. Retention of the
resource first rule in
Pennsylvania
will help preserve the health and
dignity and financial security of our seniors.
Married couples in a number of other states have not been so
fortunate - several states have changed to "income first."
To
read about DPW budget goals for the year:
http://www.dpw.state.pa.us/Exec/GovRend04-05bdgtadd.pdf
To
review DPW Secretary Richman's budget briefing slides:
http://www.dpw.state.pa.us/Exec/SecRich04-05bdgtbrief.pdf
To
read the Governor's budget:
http://www.budget.state.pa.us/budget/lib/budget/2004-2005/exec_budget/005_016_contents.pdf
More
information on DPW's proposed changes in Medical Assistance eligibility
rules, including a link to the regulations that would change
Pennsylvania
to an "income first" state, is
available on
Marshall
& Associates
website: http://www.paelderlaw.com/finsecurityregulation.html
and http://www.paelderlaw.com/dpwcomment.html
Fire
Insurer Properly Denies Coverage on Vacant Home
Written By:
Attorney
Jeffrey A. Marshall
, CELA*
Barbara
Higgins died in 1999. Her
home was left unoccupied. Her
Estate renewed the existing fire insurance covering the property, but
didn't notify the insurance company that the home was no longer
occupied. On
December 20, 2001
, the dwelling and its contents were
destroyed by fire. As of the
date of the fire, the dwelling had been unoccupied for more than 60
consecutive days.
Ms. Higgins
estate filed a claim with the fire insurance company.
However, the claim was denied based on a provision in the policy
that suspended coverage if the dwelling was vacant for 60 consecutive days
before the loss. The dispute went to the Pennsylvania Superior Court,
which entered a judgment in favor of the insurance company.
Even though the estate had paid the premiums, there was no
coverage.
While the
Higgins case involved an estate, it serves as a red flag for individuals
whose residences are left unoccupied when they move into a nursing home.
For purposes of
Medicaid, a home is an unavailable resource; but, if it is transferred or
sold, a nursing home resident can lose his or her Medicaid benefits.
So, frequently the resident retains ownership of the unoccupied
home.
If this
situation arises, it is important for the family to check the insurance
coverage on the unoccupied residence.
In the Higgins case, the insurance was fire insurance rather than
the more common homeowner's
type policy. But standard
homeowner's policies do generally limit coverage for at least some
risks, like vandalism and frozen pipes, if a home is unoccupied. There is
also a risk that an insurance company might claim that since homeowner's
insurance is "residential" insurance, and an unoccupied home is no
longer serving as residence, that coverage ceased at some point.
Unfortunately,
while insurance can be obtained for unoccupied properties, it will likely
be more expensive and more limited in coverage than a homeowner's
policy. Therefore, families
are naturally inclined not to disclose the fact that a property is
unoccupied; they hope to retain coverage just by continuing to pay the
lower premiums under the old homeowner's or fire policy.
As the Higgins case shows, there may be substantial risk by doing
this.
Instead,
families may want to discuss the unoccupied status of the home with their
insurance company representative, to make sure that the property remains
protected.
Estate of
Higgins v. Washington Mutual Fire Ins. Co. 2003
PA Super 476, (
Dec 8, 2003
).
Marshall,
Parker & Associates' Website Now Even Quicker & Easier
In the last few
days we have reorganized and updated the Articles
page on our website. Now
it's faster and easier to find the latest information on long term care,
estate planning, Veteran's Benefits, and Medicare.
Check it out at www.
paelderlaw.com/articles.html.
Also, while you are on the
site, don't forget to look at the Meet
Our Staff page that
includes updated biographical information about all of our staff members.
Do you have a
website? Do you think the
information we provide in the Elder
Care Law Alert and on our website would be useful to your on-line
visitors? If so, please
contact Melissa at mbottorf@paelderlaw.com
or at 1-800-401-4552 to add our link to your website. Help
us empower seniors and their advisors with accurate and up-to-date
information.
Pharmaceutical
Manufacturer Drug Discount Card Programs
Written By:
Josephine Balsamo
, Geriatric Planning Specialist,
Marshall, Parker & Associates'
Wilkes-Barre
Office
The
recently enacted Medicare Act of 2003 authorizes the implementation of a
temporary Medicare-approved drug discount card program.
Here is a link to more information on this new program which will
commence this Spring: http://www.paelderlaw.com/discount.html.
While
the Medicare approved cards will be available to most Medicare recipients,
it is anticipated that few will enroll in the new Government approved
program. Many Medicare
recipients may actually benefit more by taking advantage of some of the
already existing discount drug cards that are sponsored by many of the
pharmaceutical companies.
Pharmaceutical
Manufacturer Drug Discount Cards require that applicants be Medicare
recipients and have no other prescription coverage. These drug discount
cards are free and there are no enrollment or annual fees. Most
pharmaceutical company cards have income limits which vary from company to
company. The discounts
offered also vary by company and sometimes by the drug as well.
Also, the discount will only be offered at participating
pharmacies, but the list of participating pharmacies is usually vast.
Many of the pharmaceutical companies have a website where you can
obtain information about eligibility requirements for their drug discount
card program. You can also
ask at your local pharmacy which may have some information about drug
discount cards.
Below are the
names of some drug discount card programs, examples of savings they could
offer to those who qualify, and phone numbers to call or websites to visit
for more information:
|
Card
|
Coverage
|
Annual
Income Limit
|
Savings
|
|
Novartis
Care Card
1-866-974-2273
www.NovartisCarePlan.com
|
Only
Select Drugs
|
Two
Categories:
1.$18,000/Individual
$24,000/Couple
2.$28,000/Individual
$38,000/Couple
|
1.
Pay $12.00 per prescription
2.
25%-40% off
|
|
Together
Rx Card
1-800-865-7211
www.together-rx.com
|
Only
Select Drugs
|
$28,000/Individual
$38,000/Couple
|
20%-40%
off
|
|
Pfizer
For Living
Share
Card
1-800-459-4156
http://www.pfizerforliving.com/
|
All
Drugs
|
$18,000/Individual
$24,000/Couple
|
Pay
$15.00 per prescription for a 30 day supply
|
|
GlaxoSmithKline
Orange
Card
1-888-672-6436
|
All
Drugs
|
$30,000/Indivdual
$40,000/Couple
|
30%
Average Discount
|
|
Lilly
Answers
1-877-795-4559
http://www.lillyanswers.com/
|
All
Drugs
|
$18,000/Individual
$24,000/Couple
|
$12.00
per prescription for
a 30 day supply
|
If you are not
eligible for any of the above drug discount card programs because you
exceed the annual income limit and/or because you are not a Medicare
recipient, you may still be eligible for the Nonprofit Warehouse Drug
Discount Card Program which covers all drugs, has no income limits,
no age requirement, and has a savings of 50% off regular retail
price on generic drugs and up to 15% on brand name drugs. The phone number
is 1-770-541-7777 and the website is http://www.nonprofitwarehouse.com/kscriptcard.asp
Of course, low
income
Pennsylvania
seniors should also consider
enrollment in the PACE/PACENET programs.
More information on PACE/PACENET is available on our website at http://www.paelderlaw.com/newincomelimits.html
or by e-mailing the PA Department of Aging at www.PACECares@fhsc.com.
Do
you have a friend or colleague who would enjoy reading the
Elder Care Law Alert? If
so, please feel free to forward it to them. Simply use the "Forward"
button on your e-mail program.
To
subscribe or unsubscribe to the Elder Care Law Alert,
simply
send your request to:
webmail@paelderlaw.com
Does
Your Club Or Organization Need A Speaker?
If
you are interested in having an attorney or geriatric planning specialist
from
The
Elder Law Firm of Marshall,
Parker & Associates' speak to your group, or at an
upcoming event, please contact
our
Public Education Coordinator, Melissa
Bottorf
at
mbottorf@paelderlaw.com
or 1-800-401-4552
*Attorney
Marshall
is
certified as an Elder Law Attorney by the National Elder Law Foundation
under authorization from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court
Return
to Marshall, Parker & Associates' Home Page
|